Talk:Mansfield Town F.C.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Annalouiselifsey (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Matthewjoule (talk · contribs)

Football: England Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Nottinghamshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

A note on British English

British English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. However, is" works better than "are" with the term club as it is a singular and not a plural noun. (Compare with the word team which is a plural noun) --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 15:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know when the word "team" became a plural noun. Example: "The team is doing well this season.", not "The team are doing well this season." --24.144.177.92 22:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, in British English, when talking about a team, a collective unit, a group (of individuals), you can use the plural, even though it may not be gramatically correct. So, "Mansfield are buying a new player this season" is very common common and perfectly legitimate.77.125.90.248 (talk) 13:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed

I added the citations needed template. Lots of great info here, unfortunately, none of it is authenticated. Friejose 03:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MansfieldTFC Badge.gif

Image:MansfieldTFC Badge.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History

The club's history for the first 70 years is encapsulated in 5 lines. Did nothing happen worthy of mention? --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mansfield away strip Nov 63

Can anyone confirm the Mansfield away strip Nov 63 vs Watford? I seem to remember pale blue shirts and white shorts The current away strip is all pale blue, so my memory may be ok. This is to confirm the opponents of my first Wfc game .. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.135.2.186 (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

20 06 2011 Tidy Up

Hi all

Tidied up a few dead sources while updating squad.2.98.180.35 (talk) 20:29, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over sponser name

Conflict of interest user:Matthewjoule is persistently edit warring to include "Field Mill (Now known as One Call Stadium)" the info box states "No sponsor name" anyone care to comment? Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Despite being advised at an early stage that paid COI-editing is unacceptable, and the self-identification as an employee of the Football Club - hence by extension, also associated with owner John Radford - Matthewjoule has made it clear that he is under instruction to change Wikipedia content to the requirements of those over-ranking him and would continue. Further evidence is the {{spa}} (single purpose account). Firstly, I deleted two instances (one from Matthewjoule) of "One Call Insurance" (multi-millionaire Radford's main source of income, as I understand it) from Radford's page (per WP:PROMOTION). The recent 3RR was closed as "good faith", partly due to "no talk page discussion" (at this article) - 'good faith' could not be applied again considering the lengthy advice and significant warnings at his talk page. Needs to go further for exposure/advice and sanction - I am unsure if already this is beyond COIN.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 18:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 19 October 2016

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Mansfield Town, play at: One Call Stadium, Quarry Lane, Mansfield.

Ecosseboy (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it says "Field Mill" and Field Mill says "also known as One Call Stadium". So I don't think there is an error — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mansfield Town F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130721191529/http://www.mansfieldtown.net/news/article/one-call-stadium-now-at-full-capacity-928612.aspx to http://www.mansfieldtown.net/news/article/one-call-stadium-now-at-full-capacity-928612.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mansfield Town F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mansfield Town F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130620222026/http://www.mansfieldtown.net/team/staff-profiles/ to http://www.mansfieldtown.net/team/staff-profiles/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Radford added to article

I recently returned to Wikipedia after an absence of a few months to find an image of Radford had been deleted from John Radford (businessman) article's infobox, replaced by one from a copyvio (webpublished) source uploaded by a new editor with only one edit. This copyvio image was then deleted, together with the original, nominated for deletion as not being used in an article.

I requested this image in 2016 through Wikipedia from one of Radford's paid staff. I have now had the image restored and it's back up at his bio article. If any regular editor objects to it being here I have no objection to removal.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 12:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]